>"damaged in my sets too" - don't fret. My guess is whoever leeched these originally from the publisher did so pic by pic, and had connections aborted. The damage type is typical for cutting off a jpeg's byte stream. That and - there was only one original pirate, and only copies of his damage since.
Thanks also for st 84, nope, was still "needed" - wouldn't use that verb myself. Funny also how we anons can't ever be sure who we're "talking" to. My guess is currently we're at least three. The fool citing Adams all the time, the lvclouds user and the ffactory user :) Thanks all for fruitful cooperative collecting.
My current gap tally is - some no progress possible (ch mislabeled sets, damaged pics) - some where just waiting seems promising (Cutie 183-188, Sparkle 181-190, Stella most of 181-193, Sugar 260-270) - and, well, Stella 140 where I guess a kind contributor saw the request (not mine incidentally) and started one off. Plus of course some of the freshest stuff from this month. Not too bad.
Hey - how about opening another can of worms? Anybody think Nata belongs in the AMS folder as well? Even if there's no longer a portfolio of her on official AMS except strangely on the "shop" page? Looking for vid, could offer 11 sets plus the "Darling Guest 2" one?